In article <26779.1051629468@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>I agree on that --- but when it's provable that we do know better than a
>*particular* OS, dropping in the BSD qsort seems like an easy win. Can
>anyone back up Mark's finding that the BSD qsort is quicker than glibc's?
Better yet: Anyway of running performance tests from configure?
Would a simple counter in the compare function be sufficient to determine
the speed?
mrc
--
Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc
