Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 7/3/23 10:34 PM, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 04:02:06PM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>> Please find V2 attached where it's failing as soon as the database name or
>> user name are detected as overlength.
> 
> Thanks, Bertrand.  I chickened out and ended up committing v1 for now
> (i.e., simply removing the truncation code).  I didn't like the idea of
> trying to keep the new error messages consistent with code in faraway
> files, and the startup packet length limit is already pretty aggressive, so
> I'm a little less concerned about lugging around long names.  Plus, I think
> v2 had some subtle interactions with db_user_namespace (maybe for the
> better), but I didn't spend too much time looking at that since
> db_user_namespace will likely be removed soon.

Thanks Nathan for the feedback and explanations, I think that makes fully sense.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com