Re: Sort performance on large tables - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Sort performance on large tables
Date
Msg-id 9449.1131488781@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sort performance on large tables  (Charlie Savage <cfis@interserv.com>)
Responses Re: Sort performance on large tables
List pgsql-performance
Charlie Savage <cfis@interserv.com> writes:
> Thus the time decreased from 8486 seconds to 5279 seconds - which is a
> nice improvement.  However, that still leaves postgresql about 9 times
> slower.

BTW, what data type are you sorting, exactly?  If it's a string type,
what is your LC_COLLATE setting?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Charlie Savage
Date:
Subject: Re: Sort performance on large tables
Next
From: Charlie Savage
Date:
Subject: Re: Sort performance on large tables