Theo Schlossnagle <jesus@omniti.com> writes:
> I would think it would be txns that would be reading that table, but
> I'm thinking it is a bit to aggressive. Am I reading the code wrong
> there? I'm thinking it should be more selective about vxids it
> chooses to block on. I'd expect it to block on vxids touching the
> same table only.
There is no way to know whether a currently active vxid will try to look
at the other table later. We can not just ignore this case...
regards, tom lane
