Re: Rejecting weak passwords - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Date
Msg-id 9391.1254236549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rejecting weak passwords  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Rejecting weak passwords
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Why do we need to answer that question? If all we do is provide a hook, 
> the cost is very low, and the decision on value is left to whoever is 
> deploying some module to use the hook.

Right.  As long as it's just a hook, it's not enough work to justify
lots of debate.  There is a plausible use-case, and that's enough.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs