Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
Date
Msg-id 937d27e11003050137q327dd87jdf6a00a31025cde@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
Responses Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Craig Ringer
<craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:

> Why _not_ distribute gettext headers, though? Sources I can understand
> for size reasons, but the headers are small and fuss free, and you need
> the _right_ _versions_ to build against the Pg backend.

No reason, other than I didn't realise they were needed to build extension.

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Explicit psqlrc