Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
Date
Msg-id 937d27e11003050116q2b7684cs2c779780e4490813@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
Responses Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Craig Ringer
<craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:

> How do _you_ go about building server extensions for Pg? Where do you
> get the headers for gettext etc?

Same place I get the binaries - gnuwin32 mostly.

> I'm increasingly thinking the win32 package _should_ be split into
> server binary and separate headers+pdb+sources packages, with the sdk
> package including gettext headers and sources too. It'd be a LOT easier
> to develop with Pg on win32 this way.

How does breaking it up into multiple packages make it easier?


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?