Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date
Msg-id 937d27e11001210257nc9403ep4a49ba50d6e7858a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0  (Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> wrote:

> I feel sorry for 8.5 now.  It had such high hopes of becoming a proper
> version.

Yeah, well - it'll be remembered. I still find occasional references
to PostgreSQL 7.5 in the pgAdmin code.

> So, does this mean the next alpha/beta will be named 9.0 too?

9.0alpha4


--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch