Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network
Date
Msg-id 937d27e11001080833p7fe58a54ub4e1c81f18b31b5a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:12 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>> Hey Andrew
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > Windows came late to the buildfarm. According to the CVS log, the buildfarm
>> > client was first checked in in Sept 2004, got initial Mingw support in Jan
>> > 2005 and MSVC support in March 2007, when we finally got some of the tools
>> > sorted out.
>>
>> Right - but the buildfarm isn't a feature being offered to end users.
>>
>
> Neither is this. These people are developers or DBAs after all.

I know I'm a little slower than normal this week as I've had some sort
of virus, but say what? I was kinda under the impression that
developers/DBAs are end users of PostgreSQL. They make up a
significant percentage of people that I know than install, configure
and use it.


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: git help (was: Serializable Isolation without blocking)
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network