Re: libpq naming on Win64 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: libpq naming on Win64
Date
Msg-id 937d27e11001070428o4ac42bf1lc1e9da56febd91f7@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq naming on Win64  (Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm missing the point and have a question.
>>>
>>> For example, do 32bit psql and the 64bit one have the same name?
>>> If so, where will they be installed?
>>
>> I'm only talking about libpq. I see no reason to have 32 & 64 bit
>> versions of other utilities installed in parallel.
>
> Well what about the libraries (e.g openssl) libpq links?

Yes, that is an issue as I noted earlier. We probably would still have
to put the 32 bit and 64 bit libraries in a different directory
because of their naming conventions.


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq naming on Win64
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication)