Re: Application name patch - v4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Application name patch - v4
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10912020034oa0905c9r31051de5e5a7b707@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Application name patch - v4  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:

>> If we patch the back branches like that, anyone who's annoyed by the
>> extra connection cycle just has to update to latest minor release
>> of their server to make it work more smoothly.  Comments?
>>
>>                        regards, tom lane
>
> Given that this can probably be considered an *extremely* safe patch
> :-), I say go for it. It'll certainly make for less error reports
> around something that's not an error.
>
> If the patch was in any way complex I'd object against it, but this
> clearly isn't...

Agreed.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: add more frame types in window functions (ROWS)
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: cannot compile CVS HEAD