Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10911130800t61f335c5x1742d0f082bd1781@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> I had a look at this some time ago and I must admit that I find it
>> pretty interesting.  The technology choices make it
>> obviously impossible to merge -- not only the particular Perl modules
>> used, but the mere fact that Perl is used (and that such a recent
>> version is required).  But you're already aware of all this so I'm not
>> going to say more.
>
> Really?  Perl is a show-stopper?  That seems harsh.  Perl is pretty
> ubiquitous - in fact, given that we now support Windows, arguably more
> so than awk.

Building in VC++ on Windows already requires Perl. And if you're
building in mingw, you've probably already got it, or can get it
pretty easily.


--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: next CommitFest
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Listen / Notify rewrite