Re: Application name patch - v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Application name patch - v2
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10910190203h64cb46fdycdfc9e99f7ce70f8@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Application name patch - v2  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Application name patch - v2
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are some log parser's and analysers. So people use reduced log
> often. The reductions rules should be based on application name. Why
> not? And when somebody modifies to appliacation name, then these logs
> finish in '/dev/null.

So if your insecure app worries you, just don't use %a in the log
prefix, or ignore the column in the CSV logs.



-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2