Re: Porblem running on Windows 2003 server - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Porblem running on Windows 2003 server
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10909240601t23bd87aboc33e6b266cd0419a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Porblem running on Windows 2003 server  (Massimiliano Ziccardi <massimiliano.ziccardi@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Massimiliano Ziccardi
<massimiliano.ziccardi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>It was built on an
>>entirely different machine than any of the core postgresql binaries in
>>the release packages.
>
> Ok. I got it :-)
>
> However, the binaries I download from the postgres site didn't work without
> the microsoft patch indicated into that email : is this an expected
> behaviour?

Well they won't work without the runtimes installed, and I believe the
patch is just an update to the runtimes. So my guess is that it would
have worked with the standard version of the them, as originally
intended (as described at
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/v8.3.8/win32/).


--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Massimiliano Ziccardi
Date:
Subject: Re: Porblem running on Windows 2003 server
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.4.1 segfault, backtrace