Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10908100817t49f7358aoecb2c6b4312aaacf@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> 8.2 as well, no?
>
>> 8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv
>> shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I
>> haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a -
>> separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first.
>
> If it's at all hard to do, I could see deprecating 8.2 for Windows
> instead.

I could most definitely agree with that on a personal level - no more
Mingw/msys builds to maintain :-)

Alas, it's probably not practical to drop it without inconveniencing a
great many Windows users.

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format
Next
From: Brendan Jurd
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format