Re: pg_upgrade project status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: pg_upgrade project status
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10901270656t4bbb463fk24039398c15c5bc@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade project status  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade project status  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I think it's fairly easy to install Perl on Windows actually.  It
>> > doesn't sound too onerous a requirement if you want in-place upgrade;
>> > actually it looks a very reasonable one.
>>
>> There are installers for it, but given that we made a point of porting
>> everything to C to avoid using any scripting languages on end-user
>> machines when we ported to Windows, it seems strange to relax that
>> 'policy' now for convenience.
>
> If you prefer to not have pg_upgrade at all for 8.4, feel free to
> request it to be written in C ...  But I'm sure that's not what you
> meant.

I'd rather it was written in an appropriate language before feature
freeze, not in a language that makes it easier for the author but a
shade harder for thousands of users three months into feature freeze.


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Scan cost expression
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery infrastructure