Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10812010709u5a290f70kf47f90a70b8d487a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> wrote:

> it depends on how you look at it, I suppose. If you look at ":xy" as "x"
> being the 10s position and "y" being the 1s position, it makes no sense.

Suffice it to say, I don't look at it that way :-). I'd wager most
people wouldn't either, but I have no data to back that up of course.


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict