On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> Dave Page a écrit :
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
>>
>>> trac would be a good one : wiki, bug tracker and source browser. Seems a
>>> good deal :)
>>
>> We use trac for the postgresql.org infrastructure and website
>> management. It seems to go wrong on a fairly regular basis :-(
>>
>
> I know the webteam used it but wasn't aware of any problems.
Yeah - apparently it's got something to do with having 2 instances on
the same box. If it's not Trac's fault (as Magnus asserts), then it
must be the fault of one of it's dependencies, which is just a bad
imho.
>> Oh, and I just found this literally 30 minutes ago whilst adding some
>> data to the PostgreSQL product catalogue I've been hacking on:
>> http://www.initd.org/ (that's the psycopg site).
>>
>
> Hehe. First time I heard of problems with trac. So, what about mantis ?
> dalibo uses it and it works great (yeah, I know, I can also tell the same
> about trac... PostgreSQLfr use it for the translation of the PostgreSQL
> manual).
No idea about Mantis. Whatever we use, it should be as simple as
possible imho. I'd need to look into it some more.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
