Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dave Page
Subject Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10805270618u5424d9e0ta1ab092ca348eb3d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules  (Justin Clift <justin@salasaga.org>)
Responses Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules  (Justin Clift <justin@salasaga.org>)
Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules  (Justin <justin@emproshunts.com>)
Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
HI Justin

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Justin Clift <justin@salasaga.org> wrote:

> I'm trying to point out that - PG is a database system - and MS may have
> just been granted a patent for a fundamental part of it.
>
> Thinking it might need looking in to, and trying to bring it to the
> attention of some that can (or even cares?). ;>

I don't think it's a major issue. Even if MS do think we infringe on
the patent it would be laughable for them to try to do anything about
it given that our rules implementation has provably existed in a
leading FOSS project for a decade or more.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules
Next
From: "A B"
Date:
Subject: Annoying messages when copy sql code to psql terminal