On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > > Gone, sorry for the delay, thought I had already removed it ...
> >
> > Ok, I removed change_the_name from the archives too, but a new thing
> > called ,change_the_name.0 appeared.
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/,change_the_name.0/
> >
> > I assume this is just something weird arising from the way majordomo
> > deletes lists. (The archive appears empty -- I think this is just a bug
> > in the archiver processes, triggered by the initial , or the .0
> > extension. I'm not gonna waste time fixing it.)
>
> I wonder if you deleted it whilst rsync was hitting it?
Hmm, no - its on the source server too. I've added it to the excludes
list so you can delete it from the archives server. If it's safe to do
so, Marc can remove it from the list server if he feels that way
inclined.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
