Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gokulakannan Somasundaram
Subject Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Date
Msg-id 9362e74e1002240053hbe00473yc448e3fd7751d32f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
List pgsql-hackers

The fragility there is not an issue in a mostly read-only application,
but it definitely would be a concern in other cases.

While we accept that visibility map is good for read only application, why can't we make it optional? Atleast if there is a way for a person to drop the visibility map for a table(if it gets created by default), the application need not incur the overhead for those tables, when it knows it is update intensive /  with batch jobs.

Again not to deviate from my initial question, can we make a decision regarding unstable/mutable functions / broken data types ?

Thanks,
Gokul.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move documentation of all recovery.conf option to a new chapter.