Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id 933062.1600051731@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> * Starting over, it appears that 001_rep_changes.pl almost immediately
> gets into an infinite loop.  It does not complete the third test step,
> rather infinitely waiting for progress to be made.

Ah, looking closer, the problem is that wal_receiver_timeout = 60s
is too short when the sender is using CCA.  It times out before we
can get through the needed data transmission.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions