Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers
Date
Msg-id 9303.1295199150@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I think we can be more specific on that last sentence; is there even any
> *theoretical* benefit to settings above 16MB, the size of a WAL segment?

IIRC there's a forced fsync at WAL segment switch, so no.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: LOCK for non-tables
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: textarray option for file FDW