Le 09.12.2015 22:27, Josh Berkus a écrit :
> On 12/09/2015 09:27 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On 12/09/2015 09:04 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Is it just me or that situation does not strike me as "low priority"
>>> -
>>> but more of an important matter to be solved rather sooner than
>>> later?
>>
>> Exactly. Let's just use git.postgresql.org and call it good. If we
>> want
>> something in front of it, then let's use redmine.postgresql.org
>> pointed
>> at git.postgresql.org.
>
Is there any chance we could have git-lfs support on git.postgresql.org
?
https://git-lfs.github.com/
--
damien clochard
