On 02/18/2018 01:33 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 02/18/2018 11:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm fairly suspicious of toasting anything that the toast mechanism itself
>> depends on, actually, and that would include at least pg_attribute and
>> pg_index as well as pg_class. Maybe we could get away with it because
>> there would never be any actual recursion only potential recursion ...
>> but it seems scary.
>
> Well that is the other approach we could pursue -- instead of justifying
> which system catalogs need toast tables we could create an exclusion
> list of which ones should not have toast tables, with the current
> candidates being pg_class, pg_attribute, and pg_index.
The attached does exactly this. Gives all system tables toast tables
except pg_class, pg_attribute, and pg_index, and includes cat version
bump and regression test in misc_sanity.
Any further discussion, comments, complaints?
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
