Re: Improving isolationtester's data output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Improving isolationtester's data output
Date
Msg-id 923890.1623892225@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving isolationtester's data output  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 03:33:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After checking cross-version diffs to see how painful that is likely
>> to be, I'm inclined to also back-patch Michael's v13 commits
>> 989d23b04beac0c26f44c379b04ac781eaa4265e
>> Detect unused steps in isolation specs and do some cleanup
>> 9903338b5ea59093d77cfe50ec0b1c22d4a7d843
>> Remove dry-run mode from isolationtester

> There may be tests in stable branches that define steps remaining
> unused, but that's a minimal risk.

Yeah, it only results in a message in the output file anyway.

> Down to which version do you need
> these?  All the way down to 9.6?

Yes please.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: A qsort template
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Different compression methods for FPI