Hello,
I just wanted to voice my opinion for this feature... I've implemented a
few Production applicaitons with PostgreSQL now and would die for that
feature. Right now, I am constantly trying to find way's to make my data
more available. I've even resulted to using pg_dump to create read only
copies of the database and placed them behind load balancers to make the
data more available. Something like this would allow me to quickly leverage
a read only node to scale out the applicaiton... If it can at all be built,
it would get my first, second and third vote. :)
Regards,
Paul Silveira
Jonah H. Harris-2 wrote:
>
> On 2/26/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Jonah, I have no idea what "fault" you are trying to blame on the
>> community in the above statement. The author didn't discuss the idea
>> with the community before spending months on it so we have no obligation
>> to accept it in the core.
>
> You're missing the point entirely. The majority of the (vocal)
> community didn't even want the feature and as such, failed to provide
> viable suggestions for him to move forward. As the majority of the
> community didn't want the feature, it wouldn't have made a difference
> when he proposed it; which would have remained negative nonetheless.
>
> --
> Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
> EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
> 33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com
> Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Proposal-for-Implenting-read-only-queries-during-wal-replay-%28SoC-2007%29-tf3279821.html#a9197770
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.