Re: insensitive collations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: insensitive collations
Date
Msg-id 91759904-5093-de4c-1e54-e1eb18174210@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: insensitive collations  ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/01/2019 22:01, Daniel Verite wrote:
>> I don't see anything wrong here.  The collation says that both values
>> are equal, so which one is returned is implementation-dependent.
> Is it, but it's impractical if the product of seemingly the same GROUP BY
> flip-flops between its different valid results. If it can't be avoided, then
> okay. If it can be avoided at little cost, then it would be better to do it.

But there is no concept of which one of these is the preferred variant,
so I don't see how the system is supposed to pick one and then stick to
it across separate query invocations.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: insensitive collations
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: GSoC 2019