Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N
Date
Msg-id 9142.1156017681@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> The only complaint I can see is that someone
> who wants pg_dump to dump out SERIAL so it appears just as he created
> the table, doesn't get that.  Could we have pg_dump do that if the
> sequences all match the creation (weren't modified)?

pg_dump's output is often very far from what you typed in anyway.
My response to that person would be "get a life" ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: DROP OWNED BY doesn't work