Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Really? Do we intend applications to call it?
> Uh, well, we never call it ourselves, so if we don't expect other
> applications to call it, why is it there?
If it's intended for apps to call, how was the patch initially accepted
with no documentation?
regards, tom lane
