Re: BlockNumber fixes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BlockNumber fixes
Date
Msg-id 9089.1026800727@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BlockNumber fixes  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BlockNumber fixes  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> The only other
> unusual case I saw was tid outputing block number as %d and not %u.  Is
> that OK?

Seems like it should use %u.  The input side might be wrong too.

> Also, pg_class.relpages is an int.  We don't have unsigned int columns.

Yeah.  I had a todo item to look at all the uses of relpages and make
sure they were being casted to unsigned ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unused system table columns
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unused system table columns