Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
Date
Msg-id 907cfa80-9879-2c71-b4d5-ba3ba6d5512e@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/10/20 3:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes:
>> Having said that, I'm +1 on verify.
> 
> Me too, if only because it's shorter.

I also think it is (probably) more correct but failing that it is 
*definitely* shorter!

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed