Re: pg_dump seg fault on sequences - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump seg fault on sequences
Date
Msg-id 9070.1176748382@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump seg fault on sequences  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
I wrote:
> The definitional question is: if we selected only the sequence to dump,
> do we want that ALTER command to appear in the output or not?  It's a
> reasonably straightforward fix either way (a bit easier for "not"),
> but I'm unsure which is the most useful behavior.

There doesn't seem to be any strong opinion out there one way or the
other, so I'll fix it the easier way: the ALTER OWNED BY will only
appear if both the table and the sequence are selected to be dumped.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PITR - "Rewind to snapshot" scheme
Next
From: "Frederick Ross"
Date:
Subject: concatenating setof functions