David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:23:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I would argue that it's already designed wrong if there's need for
>> PL-specific implementation effort.
> I'm not sure how else to do this. The current implementation returns
> char *, which doesn't translate uniformly into the PLs.
Surely they all have a way to call a SQL function that returns text.
regards, tom lane
