Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Date
Msg-id 904085.1620762699@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
List pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> On 5/11/21 1:30 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> It just feels like this change makes the function's behavior less
>> consistent.

> See Tom's commit message here:
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=3d0f68dd30612

> In particular:

>    "The variants of these functions that take
>     numeric inputs (OIDs or column numbers) are
>     supposed to return NULL rather than failing
>     on bad input; this rule reduces problems with
>     snapshot skew when queries apply the functions
>     to all rows of a catalog."

Yeah, the null-return-for-bad-numeric-input behavior is important.
Perhaps a case could be made for returning null for bad text
input too, but I don't recall that anybody has asked for that.

A case could also be made that changing the behavior on the text
side would break applications that expect the current behavior.
So I'm disinclined to make a wholesale change there, without more
evidence that it's a good idea.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's get rid of serial_schedule
Next
From: Pavel Borisov
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's get rid of serial_schedule