Re: [HACKERS] document and use SPI_result_code_string() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> Fine for 0002. This reminds me of LockGXact and RemoveGXact in
> twophase.c, as well as _hash_squeezebucket that have some code paths
> that cannot return... Any thoughts about having some kind of
> PG_NOTREACHED defined to 0 which could be put in an assertion?

Generally we just do "Assert(false)", maybe with "not reached" in a
comment.  I don't feel a strong need to invent a new way to do that.
        regards, tom lane