Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes:
> On 01/08/2016 01:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, it's just a bug. Although apparently not many people do that, or
>> we'd have heard complaints before.
> That dredged up a memory from way back:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/200411251906.43881.aklaver@comcast.net
> in particular:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20077.1101510670@sss.pgh.pa.us
Well, that was a long time ago. Now that we have extensions, it should
be possible for pg_dump to do the right thing with an extension's members
whether they're in pg_catalog or not.
regards, tom lane
