On 2016/06/16 22:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> ISTM that a robuster solution to this is to push down the ft1-ft2-ft3 join
>> with the PHV by extending deparseExplicitTargetList() and/or something else
>> so that we can send the remote query like:
>>
>> select ft1.a, (ft3.a IS NOT NULL) from (ft1 inner join ft2 on ft1.a = ft2.a)
>> left join ft3 on ft1.a = ft3.a
> I completely agree we should have that, but not for 9.6.
OK, I'll work on that for 10.0.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
