On Mon, 20 Oct 2025, Rob Sargent wrote:
>> Okay. Now I'm curious: why do you write this?
> The way I read your description of how you use these columns currently
> suggests to me that they could be handled by a single timestamp column.
> The cost/benefit of converting is another thing altogether.
Rob,
Since either way works I'll save the time cost of converting because my
tables will never be really large.
Thanks,
Rich