Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Date
Msg-id 8ed23fd387ef0b2cfc2a206bb104411b6c064bd7.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 16:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, it depends on which libc collation you have in mind.  I was
> thinking of a libc-supplied C.UTF-8 collation, which I would expect
> to behave the same as pg_c_utf8, modulo which Unicode version it's
> based on.

Daniel Vérité documented[1] cases where the libc C.UTF-8 locale changed
the *sort* behavior, thereby affecting primary keys.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8a3dc06f-9b9d-4ed7-9a12-2070d8b0165f%40manitou-mail.org




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Next
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol