Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Mityugov
Subject Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?
Date
Msg-id 8e511a144293ae656daaeeccfe2f7893@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote 2025-09-16 16:45:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:51 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:05 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>> Oh!  Yeah, that is surely broken now.
>
>> This patch seems to work OK here.  The deform code is a little tricky
>> as you have to think carefully about which places need TypeDatum and
>> which need TypeSizeT in llvmjit_deform.c, since the v_offp variable
>> really is size_t.  Tested on Debian 13 with i386 packages installed.
>
> Thanks for doing that.  It looks generally plausible to my eye,
> but I'm hardly qualified to do a detailed review.
>
>> More changes would be needed if Datum is changed into a struct.
>
> I can only imagine us doing that as a compile option to help
> catch errors.  Our ambition need not reach to making the compile
> option play with --with-llvm, perhaps.

I tried the patch and it works well, thanks a lot to everyone involved
in fixing this.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumdb --analyze-only does not need to issue VACUUM (ONLY_DATABASE_STATS) ?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed