On 05/10/17 01:58, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:44 +0100, Jimmy Angelakos wrote:
>> Recently in rhel-7-x86_64, postgis24_96 replaced postgis2_96 by
>> obsoleting the latter meta-package, instead of adding a
>> postgis2_96-2.4.0 package.
>>
>> Because some of our Geo services had version locks on postgres and
>> postgis2_96, this has caused a number of problems in those services that
>> colleagues are mitigating right now. Is it possible to get a
>> postgis2_96-2.4.0 and to revert so that postgis24_96 does not replace
>> postgis2_96?
> Unfortunately, we can't revert that change, because we already started
> supporting more than 1 PostGIS version for many of PG releases :(
>
> Regards,
Thanks Devrim, I've advised them to select the most specific package
versions instead of generic ones from now on.
Cheers,
Jimmy
--
Jimmy Angelakos
Senior Software Engineer
EDINA
Argyle House
3 Lady Lawson Street
Edinburgh
EH3 9DR
Tel: +44 (0)131 651 1557
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
--
Sent via pgsql-pkg-yum mailing list (pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-yum
