On 04.10.23 20:30, Dave Cramer wrote:
> We need to
> figure out what is the right way to globally identify types, like
> either
> by fully-qualified name, by base name, some combination, how does it
> work with extensions, or do we need a new mechanism like UUIDs. I
> think
> that is something we need to work out, no matter which protocol
> mechanism we end up using.
>
>
> So how is this different than the GUC that I proposed ?
The last patch I see from you in this thread uses OIDs, which I have
argued is not the right solution.
