Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 8dafbecd42d5ad1d40c958fb838fcb71@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


>> Better yet, how about we bite the bullet and make the name change
>> official. Seems like a major version bump is the right time
>> to do it.

> I thought we ended up that thread already?

Well, the thread may have ended, but the problem remains. Call
it the 900 pound gorilla in a room full of elephants. I know
many people are loathe to see the discussion come up again,
but as long as the project is saddled with its ugly and
unweildy official name, it has a large problem.

It's really in the best interests of the project to make the
change as soon as possible, and undo the mistake of changing
it from Postgres in the first place. Changing it to coincide
with the interest bounce we'll get from the Oracle/MySQL
situation seems a no-brainer from an advocacy perspective.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001211135
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktYgw0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjgSwCghMphV61CIRDBGGscItZxvVQ9
E54AnjGqqYuXewjmwszaXX0sP7oWlg68
=DQfT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL