Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumeratedatabases? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumeratedatabases?
Date
Msg-id 8d6a99b8-4dfb-a52b-4079-eba4bdbda6f9@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection toenumerate databases?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/29/2017 05:54 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:

> Yes. That's actually what the autovacuum launcher does. It connects
> using InitPostgres(NULL, InvalidOid, NULL, NULL), and then scans
> pg_database to fetch a list (see get_database_list).

Thanks! It looks like if get_database_list were not static, it
would be just the thing I'm looking for.

Would an SPI query of pg_database also work, in the
bgw-connected-to-null-dbname context? I'm just wondering if
that might be clearer/fewer LOC than just copying the lower-level
approach from get_database_list.

-Chap


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases?
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication