Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] kNN for SP-GiST - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nikita Glukhov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] kNN for SP-GiST
Date
Msg-id 8d429bed-1a7f-d592-7e13-03e99defde03@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] kNN for SP-GiST  (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] kNN for SP-GiST
List pgsql-hackers
Attached  6th version of the patches.

On 09.07.2018 20:47, Andrey Borodin wrote:

>> 4 июля 2018 г., в 3:21, Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> написал(а):
>> Attached 5th version of the patches, where minor refactoring of distance
>> handling was done (see below).
> I'm reviewing this patch. Currently I'm trying to understand sp-gist scan
> deeeper, but as for now have some small notices.

Thank your for your review.

>
> Following directives can be omitted:
> #include "lib/rbtree.h"
> #include "storage/relfilenode.h"
>
> This message is not noly GiST related, is it?
> elog(ERROR, "GiST operator family's FOR ORDER BY operator must return float8 or float4 if the distance function is
lossy");
>
> Some small typos:
> usefull -> useful
> nearest-neighbour -> nearest-neighbor (or do we use e.g. "colour"?)

Fixed.

On 10.07.2018 20:09, Andrey Borodin wrote:

> I've passed through the code one more time. Here are few more questions:
> 1. Logic behind division of the patch into steps is described last time
> 2017-01-30, but ISTM actual steps have changed since than? May I ask you
> to write a bit about steps of the patchset?

A brief description of the current patch set:
1. Exported two box functions that are used in patch 5.
2. Extracted subroutine index_store_float8_orderby_distances() from GiST code
    that is common for GiST, SP-GiST, and possibly other kNN implementations
    (used in patch 4).
3. Extracted two subroutines from GiST code common for gistproperty() and
    spgistproperty() (used in path 4).
4. The main patch: added kNN support to SP-GiST.
    This patch in theory can be split into two patches: refactoring and kNN
    support, but it will require some additional effort.
    Refactoring basically consists in the extraction of spgInnerTest(),
    spgTestLeafTuple(), spgMakeInnerItem() subroutines.
    A more detailed commit history can be found in my github [1].
5. Added ordering operator point <-> point to kd_point_ops and quad_point_ops.
6. Added ordering operator polygon <-> point to poly_ops.

> 2. The patch leaves contribs intact. Do extensions with sp-gist opclasses
> need to update it's behavior somehow to be used as-is? Or to support new
> functionality?

There are no SP-GiST opclasses in contrib/, so there is nothing to change in
contrib/.  Moreover, existing extensions need to be updated only for support of
new distance-ordered searches -- they need to implement distances[][] array
calculation in their spgInnerConsistent() and spgLeafConsistent() support
functions.

> 3. There is a patch about predicate locking in SP-GiST [2] Is this KNN patch
> theoretically compatible with predicate locking? Seems like it is, I just
> want to note that this functionality may exist.

I think kNN is compatible with predicate locking.  Patch [2] does not apply
cleanly on kNN but the conflict resolution is trivial.

> 4. Scan state now have scanStack and queue. May be it's better to name
> scanStack and scanQueue or stack and queue?

"queue" was renamed to "scanQueue".

[1] https://github.com/glukhovn/postgres/commits/knn_spgist
[2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/14/1215/

-- 
Nikita Glukhov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: cannot restore schema with is not distinct from on hstore since PG 9.6.8
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix parallel index and index-only scans to fall back to serial.