On 24.10.23 22:13, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 11:44 AM Aleksander Alekseev
> <aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
>>> I think, this patch was marked as "Waiting on Author", probably, by mistake. Since recent changes were done without
anysignificant code changes and CF bot how happy again.
>>>
>>> I'm going to move it to RfC, could I? If not, please tell why.
>>
>> I restored the "Ready for Committer" state. I don't think it's a good
>> practice to change the state every time the patch has a slight
>> conflict or something. This is not helpful at all. Such things happen
>> quite regularly and typically are fixed in a couple of days.
>
> This patch seems useful to me. I went through the thread, it seems
> that all the critics are addressed.
>
> I've rebased this patch. Also, I've run perltidy for tests, split
> long errmsg() into errmsg(), errdetail() and errhint(), and do other
> minor enchantments.
>
> I think this patch is ready to go. I'm going to push it if there are
> no objections.
I just found the new pg_amcheck option --checkunique in PG17-to-be.
Could we rename this to --check-unique? Seems friendlier. Maybe also
rename the bt_index_check function argument to check_unique.