On 2025-08-01 Fr 4:03 AM, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
On Monday, July 28, 2025 1:07 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
Dear Shubham,
The attached patch introduces a new '--table' option that can be
specified after each '--database' argument.
Do we have another example which we consider the ordering of options? I'm
unsure
for it. Does getopt_long() always return parsed options with the specified
order?
The syntax is like that used in 'vacuumdb'
and supports multiple '--table' arguments per database, including
optional column lists and row filters.
Vacuumdb nor pg_restore do not accept multiple --database, right?
I'm afraid that current API has too complex.
We have another example to consider: pg_amcheck, which allows users to specify
multiple databases.
I don't think that's quite the point, as I understand it. pg_amcheck might allow you to have multiple --database arguments, but I don't think it depends on the order of arguments. You didn't answer his question about what getopt_long() does. I don't recall if it is free to mangle the argument order.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
