Re: C11: should we use char32_t for unicode code points? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: C11: should we use char32_t for unicode code points?
Date
Msg-id 8b6978c0-f888-4622-9a16-6ca12f7979ad@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C11: should we use char32_t for unicode code points?  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 28.10.25 22:54, Jeff Davis wrote:
> I went back to using the check for __cplusplus, and added a comment
> that hopefully clarifies things.

Yes, that looks more helpful now.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove specific _\n code in TAP for Windows
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread