Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Achilleas Mantzios
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10
Date
Msg-id 8aef2f96-a46c-62bd-a15e-0d1249b57dc6@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10
Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10
List pgsql-general
On 22/06/2017 11:21, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
Hi.
 
1. Why should one prefer built-in logical replication in pg-10 to pglogical, does it do anything pglogical doesn't?
It seems pglogical is more feature-rich...
2. As I understand built-in logical replication in pg-10 doesn't support large-objects, which we use a lot. Does pglogical replicate large objects? I cannot find any notes about large-objects under "Limitations and Restrictions": https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/pglogical/pglogical-docs/
You may do a simple test, create a table with a largeobject and try to read the logical stream, if it cannot represent the lo_import, lo_open, lowrite, lo_close (and I 'd bet they can't be encoded) then neither pglogical (being based on the same logical decoding technology) will support them.
 
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963


-- 
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: hvjunk
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] current postgresql logfile being written to?
Next
From: Moreno Andreo
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] "joining" table records